In our society, we are becoming more and more obsessed with having the perfect body. An illness that was once considered only a problem in girls, eating disorders are now affecting guys more and more. Can you blame our youth for being obsessed with looking perfect? No, because Hollywood as well as the rest of the world's media convinces us that we have to look perfect in order to be happy. The effects of this are real, as it seems that more celebrities are battling eating disorders than ever before such as Nicole Richie, Lindsay Lohan, and Mary-Kate Olsen (maybe Ashley, too, but I don't know which one is which.)
One thing you could blame this problem on is commodification in our media. One of my best friends just went to an event called "The Arnold Classic" where fitness and bodybuilding enthusiasts can check out new products and samples from professional bodybuilders and athletes. What this event actually is is advertisers telling you that their product will get you more fit than the rest, whether that is true or not. One could also see that this commodification is also apparent in media in which they are telling you being fit is, ultimately, the only way to be.
I can't say much about people who like to work out regularly because I like to as well, but the real problem here is geared toward the youth of our country. I feel as if our youth are getting fatter and fatter and are being made feel worse and worse for being overweight. Let's face it, parents and heredity are the determining factor for children becoming fat, but the way Hollywood represent overweight people is unfair and, as we saw in Sloop's John/ Joan Case, media definitely has an effect on the way our youth see their bodies.
Showing posts with label hugsforplugs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hugsforplugs. Show all posts
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Whiteness Tuesday
This day's class was one of the more interesting ones we've had this semester. I felt that Hess' theories were thought-provoking in our class, even if it was more negative than Dr. McCauliff would have liked, but it showed that hip-hop has an undeniable effect on our take on racial lines in music.
I think that America is still not comfortable with the idea of white people in hip-hop music, but it's more apparent in hip-hop's African American following. I feel like artists such as Eminem and a select few others only make it in hip-hop because of their white following. The message that Eminem is sending, however, is not a selective white-only one in which he talks more about his struggles from his adolescence in Detroit and drugs than anything else.
I don't want to waste any time mentioning Vanilla Ice because I feel that he did more damage for white people in hip-hop music than good. His sound was very engineered, but not quite as bad as his persona was. The Beastie Boys were at least themselves, even if you don't find yourself humming their tunes quite like you did "Ice Ice Baby".
I felt like our class had a diverse mindset on this topic today. Some people were extremely against Eminem and hip-hop altogether while some accepted white people in hip-hop, mostly Eminem. Does this show that Eminem is the only white rapper that will find his way to success in hip-hop? I doubt it because it looks like the rap game is here to stay and we're discovering new voices faster than ever.
I think that America is still not comfortable with the idea of white people in hip-hop music, but it's more apparent in hip-hop's African American following. I feel like artists such as Eminem and a select few others only make it in hip-hop because of their white following. The message that Eminem is sending, however, is not a selective white-only one in which he talks more about his struggles from his adolescence in Detroit and drugs than anything else.
I don't want to waste any time mentioning Vanilla Ice because I feel that he did more damage for white people in hip-hop music than good. His sound was very engineered, but not quite as bad as his persona was. The Beastie Boys were at least themselves, even if you don't find yourself humming their tunes quite like you did "Ice Ice Baby".
I felt like our class had a diverse mindset on this topic today. Some people were extremely against Eminem and hip-hop altogether while some accepted white people in hip-hop, mostly Eminem. Does this show that Eminem is the only white rapper that will find his way to success in hip-hop? I doubt it because it looks like the rap game is here to stay and we're discovering new voices faster than ever.
Saved By The Rhetoric
When trying to find a topic for this blog, I had a unique idea in which I wondered "Could I apply Saved By The Bell to class material?" in which I replied, "Awwww yeaaah." The first thing I thought of was the "Cool Hunting" video we watched in class. Zack was the definition of a teenage rebel in his time with his zany pranks and dating record. It was apparent how cool he was by the technique of "breaking the fourth wall" the producers used in his scenes. Any brand would have loved to have him as their model, as he could have created a whirlpool of financial gain for any company aimed towards the show's young viewers.
Another important term from class came to my mind which probably wouldn't have been thought of otherwise, but there are also elements of Marxism in the show. The principal, Mr. Belding, towers over the students as if watching their every move, especially in the case of the school's biggest rebel, Zack Morris. Zack seemed to be every kid's idol in the way that he stood to liberate the oppressed, which in this case is the student body of Bayside. Our ideology of a principal may see this rebellion toward them as normal, but now that we are adults we can see that they are just trying to do their job not unlike the turmoil we face in the workplace ourselves.
I guess I would have to say that the biggest reason I picked Saved By The Bell is due to the way we were introduced to pop culture in this class. When we ask ourselves why we study pop culture, a good answer would be that it shapes our attitudes, beliefs, and opinions. Has Saved By The Bell not done this for you in some way or another? For me it introduced me to a role I feel I played in school at times, the role of Zack "The Prankster" Morris.
Another important term from class came to my mind which probably wouldn't have been thought of otherwise, but there are also elements of Marxism in the show. The principal, Mr. Belding, towers over the students as if watching their every move, especially in the case of the school's biggest rebel, Zack Morris. Zack seemed to be every kid's idol in the way that he stood to liberate the oppressed, which in this case is the student body of Bayside. Our ideology of a principal may see this rebellion toward them as normal, but now that we are adults we can see that they are just trying to do their job not unlike the turmoil we face in the workplace ourselves.
I guess I would have to say that the biggest reason I picked Saved By The Bell is due to the way we were introduced to pop culture in this class. When we ask ourselves why we study pop culture, a good answer would be that it shapes our attitudes, beliefs, and opinions. Has Saved By The Bell not done this for you in some way or another? For me it introduced me to a role I feel I played in school at times, the role of Zack "The Prankster" Morris.
I know the topic of Facebook may seem to be talked about constantly, but when I revisited the idea of Facebook in terms of what I have learned in this class, I felt like I had some unique things to say. The theory I kept coming back to was the Parasocial Relationship Theory.
Everyone in this class knows someone that has a relationship like this on Facebook. For me, I'm not going to tell you his name, but I went to high school with a guy that leaves comments on over 30 people's Facebook pages in one day and probably only receives one or two responses. I would reply, but I have no desire to open that can of worms. This bond of intimacy that he thinks he must share with several is actually a lie. Facebook promotes this idea by allowing its users full access into the lives of people who may not know everyone that frequently visits their page.
The next topic I thought applied well to Facebook is commodification. It is hard to even see what aspects of Facebook aren't an advertisement anymore. The games are sponsored by either a brand or a person with something to gain. When people think that they are only playing a game, they are actually having a product and/or brand shoved down their throat. Something as simple as trying to help your friend's farm in Facebook's Farmville has now turned into countless hidden messages and advertising. Entities such as restaurants, clothing companies, and music moguls are now using the website via techniques such as creating a page that you can become a fan of as well as the more traditional creation of a group.
Throughout the media logic, I feel as if the Youth of America doesn't really know what they're doing when they socialize on this filthy, advertiser-friendly website. Teens may not be picking up on the advertisements in Facebook, but they are picking up on the amplified themes such as what clothes to wear and not wear, what media to consume, what to eat, and what to think. I dare you to find someone on Facebook that has nothing at all in common with anyone on Facebook. It's as if Facebook has killed creativity.
What are we supposed to do after recognizing this? Are we all supposed to delete our accounts? We can't , as a society, just delete our accounts. There are many real-life opportunities that come from this website such as finding a love interest or a possible career. That is what it was meant to achieve, right? It seems to me that this website has gone "off the beaten path" in order to exploit the users that made it profitable in order to become immensely profitable. Is this entirely their fault? No, but when a kid brings a gun to school, the parent is still somewhat to blame. I blame the consumer mess found on this website on greedy advertisers, but Facebook, I've got my eyes on you.
Everyone in this class knows someone that has a relationship like this on Facebook. For me, I'm not going to tell you his name, but I went to high school with a guy that leaves comments on over 30 people's Facebook pages in one day and probably only receives one or two responses. I would reply, but I have no desire to open that can of worms. This bond of intimacy that he thinks he must share with several is actually a lie. Facebook promotes this idea by allowing its users full access into the lives of people who may not know everyone that frequently visits their page.
The next topic I thought applied well to Facebook is commodification. It is hard to even see what aspects of Facebook aren't an advertisement anymore. The games are sponsored by either a brand or a person with something to gain. When people think that they are only playing a game, they are actually having a product and/or brand shoved down their throat. Something as simple as trying to help your friend's farm in Facebook's Farmville has now turned into countless hidden messages and advertising. Entities such as restaurants, clothing companies, and music moguls are now using the website via techniques such as creating a page that you can become a fan of as well as the more traditional creation of a group.
Throughout the media logic, I feel as if the Youth of America doesn't really know what they're doing when they socialize on this filthy, advertiser-friendly website. Teens may not be picking up on the advertisements in Facebook, but they are picking up on the amplified themes such as what clothes to wear and not wear, what media to consume, what to eat, and what to think. I dare you to find someone on Facebook that has nothing at all in common with anyone on Facebook. It's as if Facebook has killed creativity.
What are we supposed to do after recognizing this? Are we all supposed to delete our accounts? We can't , as a society, just delete our accounts. There are many real-life opportunities that come from this website such as finding a love interest or a possible career. That is what it was meant to achieve, right? It seems to me that this website has gone "off the beaten path" in order to exploit the users that made it profitable in order to become immensely profitable. Is this entirely their fault? No, but when a kid brings a gun to school, the parent is still somewhat to blame. I blame the consumer mess found on this website on greedy advertisers, but Facebook, I've got my eyes on you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)